Core i5-430M
VS
Phenom X3 8450

Core i5-430M vs Phenom X3 8450

Intel

Core i5-430M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Phenom X3 8450

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-430M is positioned at rank 12 and the Phenom X3 8450 is on rank 1023, so the Core i5-430M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-430M

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
121%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
119%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
110%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
109%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
108%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
104%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
100%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
100%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
97%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
90%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
89%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
88%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
79%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
75%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
75%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X3 8450

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
37021%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
34981%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
25399%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7652%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6061%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5302%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3037%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2997%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2729%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2729%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2698%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2625%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2589%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2578%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2555%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
91%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
100%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
100%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
96%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
96%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
95%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
95%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
95%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
92%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
92%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
90%
#1036
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
90%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
90%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-430M leads in gaming performance. However, the Phenom X3 8450 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-430MPhenom X3 8450
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($33)
⚠️ Higher cost ($147)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Toliman (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-430M stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 78% cheaper ($33 vs $147) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-430MPhenom X3 8450
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+341%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($33)
⚠️ Higher cost ($147)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-430M and Phenom X3 8450

Intel

Core i5-430M

The Core i5-430M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,210 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Phenom X3 8450

The Phenom X3 8450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,221 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-430M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom X3 8450 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8450 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core i5-430M versus 2.1 GHz on the Phenom X3 8450 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-430M. The Core i5-430M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom X3 8450 uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-430M scores 1,210 against the Phenom X3 8450's 1,221 — a 0.9% lead for the Phenom X3 8450. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-430M vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8450.

FeatureCore i5-430MPhenom X3 8450
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz+20%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Toliman (2008)
PassMark
1,210
1,221
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
750
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-430M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X3 8450 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-430MPhenom X3 8450
Socket
PGA988
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-430M) / not specified (Phenom X3 8450). The Core i5-430M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom X3 8450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-430M targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-430M rivals AMD Turion II M620.

FeatureCore i5-430MPhenom X3 8450
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Performance Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($33 vs $147), the Core i5-430M is $114 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-430M delivers 36.7 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Phenom X3 8450 — making the Core i5-430M the 126.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-430MPhenom X3 8450
MSRP
$145
Avg Price (30d)
$33-78%
$147
Performance per Dollar
36.7+342%
8.3
Release Date
2010
2008