Core i5-430M
VS
Pentium N3540

Core i5-430M vs Pentium N3540

Intel

Core i5-430M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium N3540

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-430M is positioned at rank 12 and the Pentium N3540 is on rank 1149, so the Core i5-430M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-430M

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
121%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
119%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
110%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
109%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
108%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
104%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
100%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
100%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
97%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
90%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
89%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
88%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
79%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
75%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
75%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3540

#1137
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3912%
#1138
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3855%
#1139
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3539%
#1140
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3523%
#1141
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3490%
#1143
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3371%
#1144
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3232%
#1145
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3227%
#1146
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3140%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
98%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
96%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
96%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
95%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium N3540 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-430M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-430MPentium N3540
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($33)
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-430M stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 80% cheaper ($33 vs $161) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-430MPentium N3540
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+389%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($33)
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-430M and Pentium N3540

Intel

Core i5-430M

The Core i5-430M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,210 points. Launch price was $79.

Intel

Pentium N3540

The Pentium N3540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,207 points. Launch price was $251.

Processing Power

The Core i5-430M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium N3540 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3540 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core i5-430M versus 2.66 GHz on the Pentium N3540 — a 5% clock advantage for the Pentium N3540 (base: 2.26 GHz vs 2.16 GHz). The Core i5-430M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium N3540 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-430M scores 1,210 against the Pentium N3540's 1,207 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-430M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-430M vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N3540.

FeatureCore i5-430MPentium N3540
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
2.66 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz+5%
2.16 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,210
1,207
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
750
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-430M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium N3540 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-430MPentium N3540
Socket
PGA988
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-430M) / not specified (Pentium N3540). The Core i5-430M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium N3540 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-430M targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-430M rivals AMD Turion II M620.

FeatureCore i5-430MPentium N3540
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Performance Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($33 vs $161), the Core i5-430M is $128 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-430M delivers 36.7 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Pentium N3540 — making the Core i5-430M the 132.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-430MPentium N3540
MSRP
$161
Avg Price (30d)
$33-80%
$161
Performance per Dollar
36.7+389%
7.5
Release Date
2010
2014