
Core i5-4440
Popular choices:

Core i7-2960XM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-4440
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-2960XM.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2960XM across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Core i7-2960XM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌52.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 55W.
Core i7-2960XM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 84W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,709 vs 4,788).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.
Core i5-4440
2013Core i7-2960XM
2011Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-2960XM.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 84W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2960XM across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Core i7-2960XM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌52.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,709 vs 4,788).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-4440 better than Core i7-2960XM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-2960XM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-2960XM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-2960XM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-2960XM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4440 and Core i7-2960XM

Core i5-4440
Core i5-4440
The Core i5-4440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,788 points. Launch price was $335.

Core i7-2960XM
Core i7-2960XM
The Core i7-2960XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,709 points. Launch price was $1,096.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4440 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2960XM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4440 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-2960XM — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-2960XM (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-4440 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-2960XM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4440 scores 4,788 against the Core i7-2960XM's 4,709 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i5-4440. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4440 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2960XM.
| Feature | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-2960XM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+15% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,788+2% | 4,709 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,031 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,837 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4440 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2960XM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4440 versus 1600 on the Core i7-2960XM — the Core i7-2960XM supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i5-4440) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2960XM).
| Feature | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-2960XM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | 1600+53233% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+104857500% | 32 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-2960XM has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4440) vs true (Core i7-2960XM). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4440) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2960XM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-4440 rivals Ryzen 3 1200; Core i7-2960XM rivals Core i7-2820QM.
| Feature | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-2960XM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












