
Core i5-4440

Xeon X7460
Core i5-4440 vs Xeon X7460 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4440 vs Xeon X7460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4440 vs Xeon X7460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4440
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 84W instead of 130W, a 46W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon X7460 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X7460.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,788 vs 4,803).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X7460, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Xeon X7460 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon X7460
2008Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌54.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 84W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-4440 better than Xeon X7460?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4440 vs Xeon X7460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4440
The Core i5-4440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,788 points. Launch price was $335.

Xeon X7460
The Xeon X7460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 September 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Dunnington (2008) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per module). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,803 points. Launch price was $2,729.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4440 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X7460 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon X7460 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4440 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X7460 — a 132.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-4440 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core i5-4440 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X7460 uses Dunnington (2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4440 scores 4,788 against the Xeon X7460's 4,803 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon X7460. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4440 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon X7460.
| Feature | Core i5-4440 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+393% | 0.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+17% | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 3 MB (per module)+1100% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Dunnington (2008) |
| PassMark | 4,788 | 4,803 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,031 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,837 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4440 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7460 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4440 versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon X7460 — the Core i5-4440 supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-4440) vs 4 (Xeon X7460). Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i5-4440) and Intel 7300 (Xeon X7460).
| Feature | Core i5-4440 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+140% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4440) vs VT-x (Xeon X7460). The Core i5-4440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon X7460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4440 targets Budget, Xeon X7460 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-4440 rivals Ryzen 3 1200; Xeon X7460 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Core i5-4440 | Xeon X7460 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













