Core i5-4440 vs FX-8140

CPU

GPU

Core i5-4440

4 Cores4 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

FX-8140

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2012

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-4440 vs FX-8140 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4440

4 / 4

4,788

0.0%

4,860

+1.5%

FX-4130

FX-7500

Athlon X4 845

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4440 vs FX-8140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4440 vs FX-8140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4440

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($184 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.0 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Draws 84W instead of 95W, a 11W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while FX-8140 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8140 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,788 vs 4,860).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-8140

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 26.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8140 better than Core i5-4440?

Yes. FX-8140 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8140 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8140 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8140 is still the much better call for a fresh build. FX-8140 comes in 22.3% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $184 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 20.5% better value on paper (26.0 vs 21.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4440 vs FX-8140 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4440

The Core i5-4440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,788 points. Launch price was $335.

FX-8140

The FX-8140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,860 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4440 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8140 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8140 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4440 versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-8140 — a 21.6% clock advantage for the FX-8140 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-4440 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-8140 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4440 scores 4,788 against the FX-8140's 4,860 — a 1.5% lead for the FX-8140. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4440 vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-8140.

Feature	Core i5-4440	FX-8140
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8 MB+3100%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	4,788	4,860+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,031	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,837	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4440 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8140 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4440	FX-8140
Socket	LGA1150	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4440) / not specified (FX-8140). The Core i5-4440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-8140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-4440 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.

Feature	Core i5-4440	FX-8140
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4440 was priced at $184, while the FX-8140 came in at $225. On launch pricing ($184 vs $225), Core i5-4440 was $41 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4440 delivers 26.0 pts/$ vs 21.6 pts/$ for the FX-8140 — making the Core i5-4440 the 18.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4440	FX-8140
MSRP	$184-18%	$225
Performance per Dollar	26.0+20%	21.6
Release Date	2013	2012

Search Core i5-4440 on Amazon

Search FX-8140 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.