Core i5-4440 vs Core i7-3635QM

Intel

Core i5-4440

4 Cores4 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-3635QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-4440 vs Core i7-3635QM Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4440 vs Core i7-3635QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4440 vs Core i7-3635QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4440

2013

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-3635QM needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-3635QM.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3635QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Core i7-3635QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.

Core i7-3635QM

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,728 vs 4,788).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4440 better than Core i7-3635QM?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-3635QM is ahead with a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4440 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-4440 is the better buy right now. Core i5-4440 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $184 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-3635QM is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (26.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4440 vs Core i7-3635QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-4440

The Core i5-4440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,788 points. Launch price was $335.

Intel

Core i7-3635QM

The Core i7-3635QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,728 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4440 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3635QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4440 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-3635QM — a 3% clock advantage for the Core i7-3635QM (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-4440 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3635QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4440 scores 4,788 against the Core i7-3635QM's 4,728 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-4440. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-4440Core i7-3635QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+29%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,788+1%
4,728
Geekbench 6 Single
1,031
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,837
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4440 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3635QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-4440Core i7-3635QM
Socket
LGA1150
FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4440) / not specified (Core i7-3635QM). The Core i5-4440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-3635QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-4440 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.

FeatureCore i5-4440Core i7-3635QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget