
Core i5-4440
Popular choices:

Core i7-3635QM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-4440
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-3635QM needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-3635QM.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Core i7-3635QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.
Core i7-3635QM
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,728 vs 4,788).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.
Core i5-4440
2013Core i7-3635QM
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-3635QM needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-3635QM.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Core i7-3635QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,728 vs 4,788).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-4440 better than Core i7-3635QM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-3635QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-3635QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-3635QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-3635QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4440 and Core i7-3635QM

Core i5-4440
Core i5-4440
The Core i5-4440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,788 points. Launch price was $335.

Core i7-3635QM
Core i7-3635QM
The Core i7-3635QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,728 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4440 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3635QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4440 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-3635QM — a 3% clock advantage for the Core i7-3635QM (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-4440 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3635QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4440 scores 4,788 against the Core i7-3635QM's 4,728 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-4440. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-3635QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+29% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,788+1% | 4,728 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,031 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,837 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4440 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3635QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-3635QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FCBGA1224 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4440) / not specified (Core i7-3635QM). The Core i5-4440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-3635QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-4440 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.
| Feature | Core i5-4440 | Core i7-3635QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












