Core i5-4440 vs N200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4440 vs N200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4440 vs N200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4440

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($184 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while N200 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike N200.

Trade-offs

❌1300% higher power demand at 84W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1150, while N200 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N200

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 84W, a 78W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,729 vs 4,788).
❌
4.9% HIGHER MSRP
$193 MSRPvs$184 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4440.

Quick Answers

So, is N200 better than Core i5-4440?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, N200 is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4440 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

N200 is still the much better call for a fresh build. N200 comes in 4.9% more expensive on MSRP at $193 MSRP versus $184 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 6.2% better value on paper (26.0 vs 24.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

N200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1150. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-4440 vs N200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4440

The Core i5-4440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,788 points. Launch price was $335.

N200

The N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 4,729 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4440 and N200 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4440 versus 3.7 GHz on the N200 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the N200. The Core i5-4440 is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-4440 scores 4,788 against the N200's 4,729 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-4440. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4440 vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N200.

Feature	Core i5-4440	N200
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.7 GHz+12%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	22 nm	Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	—
PassMark	4,788+1%	4,729
Geekbench 6 Single	1,031	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,837	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4440 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N200 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4440	N200
Socket	LGA1150	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4440) / not specified (N200). The Core i5-4440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the N200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-4440 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.

Feature	Core i5-4440	N200
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4440 was priced at $184, while the N200 came in at $193. On launch pricing ($184 vs $193), Core i5-4440 was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4440 delivers 26.0 pts/$ vs 24.5 pts/$ for the N200 — making the Core i5-4440 the 6% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4440	N200
MSRP	$184-5%	$193
Performance per Dollar	26.0+6%	24.5
Release Date	2013	2023

Search Core i5-4440 on Amazon

Search N200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.