Core i5-4460 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4460 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4460 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4460

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 84W instead of 140W, a 56W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD 4600, while Xeon E5-1607 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-1607 v3.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,915 vs 4,932).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1607 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1607 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 84W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4460 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4460.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4460 better than Xeon E5-1607 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1607 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4460 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1607 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4460 is the better buy right now. Core i5-4460 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $182 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1607 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1607 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4460 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4460

The Core i5-4460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,915 points. Launch price was $182.

Xeon E5-1607 v3

The Xeon E5-1607 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,932 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4460 and Xeon E5-1607 v3 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4460 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v3 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-4460 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-4460 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4460 scores 4,915 against the Xeon E5-1607 v3's 4,932 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v3. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4460 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v3.

Feature	Core i5-4460	Xeon E5-1607 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+10%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+3%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	4,915	4,932
Cinebench R23 Multi	512	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,104	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,901	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4460 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4460	Xeon E5-1607 v3
Socket	LGA1150	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4460) / not specified (Xeon E5-1607 v3). The Core i5-4460 includes integrated graphics (HD 4600), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-4460 rivals Core i5-4440.