PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4460 vs Xeon E5645 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4460 vs Xeon E5645: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4460

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 60.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.0 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD 4600, while Xeon E5645 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5645.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,915 vs 4,942).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5645, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E5645

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Draws 80W instead of 84W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 27.0 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4460 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4460.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5645 better than Core i5-4460?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5645 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4460 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5645 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5645 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5645 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5645 comes in 61.5% more expensive on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4460 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 60.7% better value on paper (27.0 vs 16.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4460 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4460 vs Xeon E5645 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4460

The Core i5-4460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,915 points. Launch price was $182.

Xeon E5645

The Xeon E5645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,942 points. Launch price was $294.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4460 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5645 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4460 versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon E5645 — a 24.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4460 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-4460 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5645 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4460 scores 4,915 against the Xeon E5645's 4,942 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5645. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4460 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5645.

Feature	Core i5-4460	Xeon E5645
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+27%	2.67 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+33%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	4,915	4,942
Cinebench R23 Multi	512	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,104	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,901	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4460 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5645 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4460 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon E5645 — the Core i5-4460 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5645 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-4460) vs 3 (Xeon E5645). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-4460) vs 0 (Xeon E5645) — the Core i5-4460 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-4460	Xeon E5645
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	288 GB+800%
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4460) vs VT-x (Xeon E5645). The Core i5-4460 includes integrated graphics (HD 4600), while the Xeon E5645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4460 targets Budget, Xeon E5645 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-4460 rivals Core i5-4440.

Feature	Core i5-4460	Xeon E5645
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD 4600	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4460 was priced at $182, while the Xeon E5645 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($182 vs $294), Core i5-4460 was $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4460 delivers 27.0 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5645 — making the Core i5-4460 the 46.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4460	Xeon E5645
MSRP	$182-38%	$294
Performance per Dollar	27.0+61%	16.8
Release Date	2014	2010

Search Core i5-4460 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5645 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.