Core i5-4460T vs FX-6100

Intel

Core i5-4460T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

FX-6100

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-4460T vs FX-6100 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4460T vs FX-6100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4460T vs FX-6100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4460T

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while FX-6100 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike FX-6100.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,651 vs 3,686).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($187 MSRP vs $165 MSRP).

FX-6100

2011

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Costs $22 less on MSRP ($165 MSRP vs $187 MSRP).
  • Delivers 14.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($165 MSRP vs $187 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4460T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4460T.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6100 better than Core i5-4460T?
Yes. FX-6100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, FX-6100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
FX-6100 is the better buy right now. FX-6100 comes in $22 cheaper on MSRP at $165 MSRP versus $187 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 14.4% better value on MSRP (22.3 vs 19.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4460T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4460T vs FX-6100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-4460T

The Core i5-4460T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,651 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-6100

The FX-6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,686 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4460T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6100 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-4460T versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-6100 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the FX-6100 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-4460T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-6100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4460T scores 3,651 against the FX-6100's 3,686 — a 1% lead for the FX-6100. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4460T vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6100.

FeatureCore i5-4460TFX-6100
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.9 GHz+44%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
3.3 GHz+74%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
6 MB+2300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,651
3,686
Geekbench 6 Single
807
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4460T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-4460TFX-6100
Socket
LGA1150
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4460T) / not specified (FX-6100). The Core i5-4460T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-6100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4460T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4460T rivals A8-7600.

FeatureCore i5-4460TFX-6100
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4460T was priced at $187, while the FX-6100 came in at $165. On launch pricing ($187 vs $165), FX-6100 was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4460T delivers 19.5 pts/$ vs 22.3 pts/$ for the FX-6100 — making the FX-6100 the 13.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-4460TFX-6100
MSRP
$187
$165-12%
Performance per Dollar
19.5
22.3+14%
Release Date
2014
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.