Core i5-4460T vs Xeon W3580

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4460T vs Xeon W3580 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4460T vs Xeon W3580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4460T

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($187 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 57.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($187 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3580 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3580, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon W3580

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,638 vs 3,651).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $187 MSRP).
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4460T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4460T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4460T better than Xeon W3580?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3580 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4460T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4460T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4460T is the better buy right now. Core i5-4460T comes in $107 cheaper on MSRP at $187 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W3580 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 57.8% better value on MSRP (19.5 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4460T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4460T vs Xeon W3580 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4460T

The Core i5-4460T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,651 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon W3580

The Xeon W3580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,638 points. Launch price was $215.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4460T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3580's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-4460T versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3580 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W3580 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i5-4460T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3580 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4460T scores 3,651 against the Xeon W3580's 3,638 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-4460T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4460T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3580.

Feature	Core i5-4460T	Xeon W3580
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.6 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3.33 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,651	3,638
Geekbench 6 Single	807	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4460T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3580 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4460T	Xeon W3580
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4460T) / not specified (Xeon W3580). The Core i5-4460T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon W3580 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4460T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4460T rivals A8-7600.

Feature	Core i5-4460T	Xeon W3580
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4460T was priced at $187, while the Xeon W3580 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($187 vs $294), Core i5-4460T was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4460T delivers 19.5 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W3580 — making the Core i5-4460T the 44.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4460T	Xeon W3580
MSRP	$187-36%	$294
Performance per Dollar	19.5+57%	12.4
Release Date	2014	2009

Search Core i5-4460T on Amazon

Search Xeon W3580 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.