Core i5-450M
VS
A4-1250

Core i5-450M vs A4-1250

Intel

Core i5-450M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A4-1250

2 Cores2 Thrd8 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-450M is positioned at rank 10 and the A4-1250 is on rank 1023, so the Core i5-450M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-450M

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
116%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
114%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
105%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
105%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
104%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
100%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
96%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
96%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
93%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
86%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
85%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
84%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
75%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
72%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-1250

#1011
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2332%
#1012
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2298%
#1013
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2110%
#1014
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2100%
#1015
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2081%
#1017
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2010%
#1018
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1927%
#1019
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1924%
#1020
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1872%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
99%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
97%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
94%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-450M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A4-1250 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-450MA4-1250
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($31)
More affordable ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the A4-1250 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $30 (vs $31), it costs 3% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 3% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i5-450M.
InsightCore i5-450MA4-1250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($31)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-450M and A4-1250

Intel

Core i5-450M

The Core i5-450M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,264 points. Launch price was $32.

AMD

A4-1250

The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Core i5-450M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A4-1250's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Core i5-450M versus 1 GHz on the A4-1250 — a 90.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-450M. The Core i5-450M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the A4-1250 uses Temash (2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-450M scores 1,264 against the A4-1250's 1,258 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-450M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-450M vs 0 kB on the A4-1250.

FeatureCore i5-450MA4-1250
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz+166%
1 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Temash (2013)
PassMark
1,264
1,258
Geekbench 6 Single
111
Geekbench 6 Multi
188
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-450M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A4-1250 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core i5-450M versus DDR3L 1333 MHz on the A4-1250 — the A4-1250 supports 186.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-450M) vs 1 (A4-1250). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-450M) vs 8 (A4-1250) — the Core i5-450M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-450M) and FT3 (A4-1250).

FeatureCore i5-450MA4-1250
Socket
PGA988
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1066+35433%
DDR3L 1333 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
8
8 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-450M) and Radeon HD 8210 (A4-1250) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i5-450M rivals AMD Turion II M620; A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740.

FeatureCore i5-450MA4-1250
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Radeon HD 8210
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true
Target Use
Tablet
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-450M launched at $32 MSRP, while the A4-1250 debuted at $100. At current prices ($31 vs $30), the A4-1250 is $1 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-450M delivers 40.8 pts/$ vs 41.9 pts/$ for the A4-1250 — making the A4-1250 the 2.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-450MA4-1250
MSRP
$32-68%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$31
$30-3%
Performance per Dollar
40.8
41.9+3%
Release Date
2010
2013