
Core i5-4590

Xeon E5-2609 v4
Core i5-4590 vs Xeon E5-2609 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4590 vs Xeon E5-2609 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4590 vs Xeon E5-2609 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4590
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 84W instead of 85W, a 1W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E5-2609 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2609 v4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2609 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,376 vs 5,418).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2609 v4, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2609 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2609 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4590 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4590.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2609 v4 better than Core i5-4590?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4590 vs Xeon E5-2609 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4590
The Core i5-4590 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,376 points. Launch price was $202.

Xeon E5-2609 v4
The Xeon E5-2609 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,418 points. Launch price was $306.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4590 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-4590 versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v4 — a 74.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4590 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i5-4590 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4590 scores 5,376 against the Xeon E5-2609 v4's 5,418 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2609 v4. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4590 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2609 v4.
| Feature | Core i5-4590 | Xeon E5-2609 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+118% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+94% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 20 MB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 5,376 | 5,418 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,100 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4590 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4590 | Xeon E5-2609 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4590) / not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v4). The Core i5-4590 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-2609 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4590 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4590 rivals FX-8350.
| Feature | Core i5-4590 | Xeon E5-2609 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












