
Atom x7425E

Core i5-4590
Atom x7425E vs Core i5-4590 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7425E vs Core i5-4590 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7425E vs Core i5-4590: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7425E
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 12W instead of 84W, a 72W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4590 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4590.
Core i5-4590
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7425E.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,376 vs 5,427).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Atom x7425E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 84W vs 12W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1150, while Atom x7425E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom x7425E better than Core i5-4590?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7425E vs Core i5-4590 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7425E
The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-4590
The Core i5-4590 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,376 points. Launch price was $202.
Processing Power
Both the Atom x7425E and Core i5-4590 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-4590 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-4590 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-4590 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Core i5-4590's 5,376 — a 0.9% lead for the Atom x7425E. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom x7425E | Core i5-4590 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+120% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 256K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Gracemont (2023) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,427 | 5,376 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-4590 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4590 — the Atom x7425E supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4590 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 2 (Core i5-4590). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 16 (Core i5-4590) — the Core i5-4590 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7425E) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i5-4590).
| Feature | Atom x7425E | Core i5-4590 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+200% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4590). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4590) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4590 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4590 rivals FX-8350.
| Feature | Atom x7425E | Core i5-4590 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














