Core i5-4670R vs Core i7-3610QE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670R vs Core i7-3610QE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670R vs Core i7-3610QE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670R

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $315 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $315 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3610QE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,233 vs 5,234).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3610QE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-3610QE

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Core i5-4670R needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 23.4 PassMark/$ ($315 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3610QE better than Core i5-4670R?

Yes. Core i7-3610QE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3610QE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3610QE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3610QE is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-3610QE comes in 40.6% more expensive on MSRP at $315 MSRP versus $224 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4670R only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4670R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4670R vs Core i7-3610QE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670R

The Core i5-4670R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,233 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-3610QE

The Core i7-3610QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,234 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670R packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3610QE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-4670R versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QE — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670R (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-4670R uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3610QE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670R scores 5,233 against the Core i7-3610QE's 5,234 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-3610QE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-4670R vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3610QE.

Feature	Core i5-4670R	Core i7-3610QE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+12%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+30%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6144 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	5,233	5,234

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3610QE uses G2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4670R	Core i7-3610QE
Socket	BGA1364	G2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-4670R) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3610QE). The Core i7-3610QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i5-4670R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QE targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i5-4670R	Core i7-3610QE
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4670R was priced at $224, while the Core i7-3610QE came in at $315. On launch pricing ($224 vs $315), Core i5-4670R was $91 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670R delivers 23.4 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-3610QE — making the Core i5-4670R the 33.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4670R	Core i7-3610QE
MSRP	$224-29%	$315
Performance per Dollar	23.4+41%	16.6
Release Date	2013	2012

Search Core i5-4670R on Amazon

Search Core i7-3610QE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.