Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-4670R

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-4670R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-4670R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Core i5-4670R needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,231 vs 5,233).

Core i5-4670R

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌
5.2% HIGHER MSRP
$224 MSRPvs$213 MSRP
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4670R better than Core i3-1115G4E?

Yes. Core i5-4670R is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4670R is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670R is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4670R is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i5-4670R comes in 5.2% more expensive on MSRP at $224 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-1115G4E only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 8.2% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1115G4E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-4670R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Core i5-4670R

The Core i5-4670R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,233 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4670R offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-4670R has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-4670R — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-4670R uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Core i5-4670R's 5,233 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-4670R. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4E vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-4670R.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i5-4670R
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+5%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,231	5,233
Geekbench 6 Single	1,506	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-4670R uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i5-4670R
Socket	FCBGA1449	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) / not specified (Core i5-4670R). The Core i3-1115G4E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Core i5-4670R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i5-4670R
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-1115G4E was priced at $213, while the Core i5-4670R came in at $224. On launch pricing ($213 vs $224), Core i3-1115G4E was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115G4E delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 23.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670R — making the Core i3-1115G4E the 5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i5-4670R
MSRP	$213-5%	$224
Performance per Dollar	24.6+5%	23.4
Release Date	2020	2013

Search Core i3-1115G4E on Amazon

Search Core i5-4670R on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.