Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i7-3610QE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i7-3610QE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i7-3610QE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $102 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $315 MSRP).
✅Delivers 47.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $315 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3610QE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,231 vs 5,234).

Core i7-3610QE

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($315 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3610QE better than Core i3-1115G4E?

Yes. Core i7-3610QE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3610QE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3610QE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3610QE is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-3610QE comes in 47.9% more expensive on MSRP at $315 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-1115G4E only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 15.2% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1115G4E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i7-3610QE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Core i7-3610QE

The Core i7-3610QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,234 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-3610QE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-3610QE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QE — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-3610QE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Core i7-3610QE's 5,234 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-3610QE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4E vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3610QE.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i7-3610QE
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+18%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.3 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	5,231	5,234
Geekbench 6 Single	1,506	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-3610QE uses G2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i3-1115G4E versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3610QE — the Core i3-1115G4E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-1115G4E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1115G4E) vs 16 (Core i7-3610QE) — the Core i7-3610QE offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i7-3610QE
Socket	FCBGA1449	G2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+100%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1115G4E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3610QE). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU) (Core i3-1115G4E) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3610QE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded, Core i7-3610QE targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i7-3610QE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)	HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-1115G4E was priced at $213, while the Core i7-3610QE came in at $315. On launch pricing ($213 vs $315), Core i3-1115G4E was $102 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115G4E delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-3610QE — making the Core i3-1115G4E the 38.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i7-3610QE
MSRP	$213-32%	$315
Performance per Dollar	24.6+48%	16.6
Release Date	2020	2012

Search Core i3-1115G4E on Amazon

Search Core i7-3610QE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.