Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i3-8100T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i3-8100T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i3-8100T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-8100T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,231 vs 5,257).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).

Core i3-8100T

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $96 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
✅Delivers 83.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-8100T better than Core i3-1115G4E?

Yes. Core i3-8100T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-8100T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8100T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-8100T is the better buy right now. Core i3-8100T comes in $96 cheaper on MSRP at $117 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 83.0% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1115G4E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i3-8100T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Core i3-8100T

The Core i3-8100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,257 points. Launch price was $117.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-8100T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-8100T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-8100T — a 22.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-8100T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Core i3-8100T's 5,257 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-8100T. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i3-8100T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+26%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.1 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	5,231	5,257
Geekbench 6 Single	1,506	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-8100T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i3-1115G4E versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8100T — the Core i3-1115G4E supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1115G4E) vs 16 (Core i3-8100T) — the Core i3-8100T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i3-8100T
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+33%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1115G4E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100T). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU) (Core i3-1115G4E) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-8100T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded, Core i3-8100T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i3-8100T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-1115G4E was priced at $213, while the Core i3-8100T came in at $117. On launch pricing ($213 vs $117), Core i3-8100T was $96 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115G4E delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 44.9 pts/$ for the Core i3-8100T — making the Core i3-8100T the 58.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i3-8100T
MSRP	$213	$117-45%
Performance per Dollar	24.6	44.9+83%
Release Date	2020	2018

Search Core i3-1115G4E on Amazon

Search Core i3-8100T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.