PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i7-4702MQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i7-4702MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 81.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 13.5 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 37W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4702MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-4702MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,187 vs 5,231).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
❌146.7% higher power demand at 37W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1115G4E better than Core i7-4702MQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4702MQ is ahead with a 17.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1115G4E pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i7-4702MQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1115G4E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1115G4E is the better buy right now. Core i3-1115G4E comes in $170 cheaper on MSRP at $213 MSRP versus $383 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4702MQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 81.3% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 13.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1115G4E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i7-4702MQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Core i7-4702MQ

The Core i7-4702MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,187 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4702MQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-4702MQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702MQ — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-4702MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Core i7-4702MQ's 5,187 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-1115G4E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,506 vs 965, a 43.8% lead for the Core i3-1115G4E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4E vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4702MQ.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i7-4702MQ
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+22%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,231	5,187
Geekbench 6 Single	1,506+56%	965
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-4702MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i3-1115G4E versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4702MQ — the Core i3-1115G4E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-1115G4E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1115G4E) vs 16 (Core i7-4702MQ) — the Core i7-4702MQ offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i7-4702MQ
Socket	FCBGA1449	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+100%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1115G4E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4702MQ). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU) (Core i3-1115G4E) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4702MQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded, Core i7-4702MQ targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516; Core i7-4702MQ rivals Ryzen 7 3750H.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i7-4702MQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-1115G4E was priced at $213, while the Core i7-4702MQ came in at $383. On launch pricing ($213 vs $383), Core i3-1115G4E was $170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115G4E delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 13.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-4702MQ — making the Core i3-1115G4E the 57.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP	$213-44%	$383
Performance per Dollar	24.6+82%	13.5
Release Date	2020	2013

Search Core i3-1115G4E on Amazon

Search Core i7-4702MQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.