PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-7500T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-7500T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-7500T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
5.4% HIGHER MSRP
$213 MSRPvs$202 MSRP

Core i5-7500T

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($202 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,215 vs 5,231).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1115G4E better than Core i5-7500T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-7500T is ahead with a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1115G4E pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1115G4E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1115G4E is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-1115G4E comes in 5.4% more expensive on MSRP at $213 MSRP versus $202 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Core i5-7500T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 5.1% better value on paper (25.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1115G4E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-7500T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Core i5-7500T

The Core i5-7500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,215 points. Launch price was $202.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-7500T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-7500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-7500T — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-7500T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Core i5-7500T's 5,215 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-1115G4E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,506 vs 1,100, a 31.2% lead for the Core i3-1115G4E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i5-7500T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+18%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.7 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,231	5,215
Geekbench 6 Single	1,506+37%	1,100
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,023

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-7500T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i3-1115G4E versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7500T — the Core i3-1115G4E supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1115G4E) vs 16 (Core i5-7500T) — the Core i5-7500T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i5-7500T
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+33%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1115G4E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU) (Core i3-1115G4E) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7500T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded, Core i5-7500T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516; Core i5-7500T rivals Ryzen 3 1200.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i5-7500T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Embedded	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-1115G4E was priced at $213, while the Core i5-7500T came in at $202. On launch pricing ($213 vs $202), Core i5-7500T was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115G4E delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 25.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-7500T — making the Core i5-7500T the 5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Core i5-7500T
MSRP	$213	$202-5%
Performance per Dollar	24.6	25.8+5%
Release Date	2020	2017

Search Core i3-1115G4E on Amazon

Search Core i5-7500T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.