Core i3-1115G4E vs Xeon E5-2648L

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Xeon E5-2648L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Xeon E5-2648L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Xeon E5-2648L needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2648L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,231 vs 5,262).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2648L, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2648L mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2648L

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2648L better than Core i3-1115G4E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2648L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-1115G4E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2648L is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 24.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2648L is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2648L is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-2648L comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-1115G4E only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 24.0% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1115G4E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Xeon E5-2648L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Xeon E5-2648L

The Xeon E5-2648L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,262 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2648L offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2648L has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L — a 51.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2648L uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Xeon E5-2648L's 5,262 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4E vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2648L.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Xeon E5-2648L
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+70%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+22%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	5,231	5,262
Geekbench 6 Single	1,506	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2648L uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Xeon E5-2648L
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) / not specified (Xeon E5-2648L). The Core i3-1115G4E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Xeon E5-2648L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516.