Core i3-1115G4E vs Opteron 6272
Core i3-1115G4E
Opteron 6272
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-1115G4E is positioned at rank 795 and the Opteron 6272 is on rank 65, so the Opteron 6272 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-1115G4E
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6272
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-1115G4E | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($47) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Interlagos (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-1115G4E | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+6%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($47) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-1115G4E and Opteron 6272
Core i3-1115G4E
The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.
Opteron 6272
The Opteron 6272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8.00391 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,240 points. Launch price was $325.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6272 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6272 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 3 GHz on the Opteron 6272 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Opteron 6272 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Opteron 6272's 5,240 — a 0.2% lead for the Opteron 6272. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4E vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6272.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4E | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 16 / 16+700% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+30% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 8.00391 MB (per core)+540% |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 5,231 | 5,240 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,506 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Opteron 6272 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4E | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) / not specified (Opteron 6272). The Core i3-1115G4E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Opteron 6272 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4E | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-1115G4E launched at $213 MSRP, while the Opteron 6272 debuted at $523. At current prices ($47 vs $50), the Core i3-1115G4E is $3 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115G4E delivers 111.3 pts/$ vs 104.8 pts/$ for the Opteron 6272 — making the Core i3-1115G4E the 6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4E | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $213-59% | $523 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $47-6% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.3+6% | 104.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-1115G4E and Opteron 6272
