Core i3-1115G4E vs Opteron 6272

Core i3-1115G4E vs Opteron 6272 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-1115G4E

2 / 4

5,231

0.0%

5,240

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Opteron 6272 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Opteron 6272: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $310 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $523 MSRP).
✅Delivers 145.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $523 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Opteron 6272 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6272 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,231 vs 5,240).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6272, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6272

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($523 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6272 better than Core i3-1115G4E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6272 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-1115G4E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6272 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 24.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6272 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6272 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Opteron 6272 comes in 145.5% more expensive on MSRP at $523 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-1115G4E only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 24.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1115G4E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2011) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Opteron 6272 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Opteron 6272

The Opteron 6272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8.00391 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,240 points. Launch price was $325.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6272 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6272 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 3 GHz on the Opteron 6272 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Opteron 6272 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Opteron 6272's 5,240 — a 0.2% lead for the Opteron 6272. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4E vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6272.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Opteron 6272
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	16 / 16+700%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+30%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+5%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	8.00391 MB (per core)+540%
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark	5,231	5,240
Geekbench 6 Single	1,506	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Opteron 6272 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Opteron 6272
Socket	FCBGA1449	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) / not specified (Opteron 6272). The Core i3-1115G4E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Opteron 6272 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Opteron 6272
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-1115G4E was priced at $213, while the Opteron 6272 came in at $523. On launch pricing ($213 vs $523), Core i3-1115G4E was $310 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115G4E delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 10.0 pts/$ for the Opteron 6272 — making the Core i3-1115G4E the 84.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Opteron 6272
MSRP	$213-59%	$523
Performance per Dollar	24.6+146%	10.0
Release Date	2020	2011

Search Core i3-1115G4E on Amazon

Search Opteron 6272 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.