
Core i5-4670R

Core i7-4702MQ
Core i5-4670R vs Core i7-4702MQ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4670R vs Core i7-4702MQ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4670R vs Core i7-4702MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4670R
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $159 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.4 vs 13.5 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4702MQ across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌75.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 37W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4702MQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-4702MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 65W, a 28W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i5-4670R needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,187 vs 5,233).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 23.4 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-4670R better than Core i7-4702MQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4670R vs Core i7-4702MQ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670R
The Core i5-4670R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,233 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-4702MQ
The Core i7-4702MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,187 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4670R packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4702MQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-4670R versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702MQ — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670R (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-4670R scores 5,233 against the Core i7-4702MQ's 5,187 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-4670R. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-4670R vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4702MQ.
| Feature | Core i5-4670R | Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,233 | 5,187 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 965 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,180 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4670R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4702MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4670R | Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-4670R) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4702MQ). The Core i7-4702MQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-4670R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4702MQ targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-4702MQ rivals Ryzen 7 3750H.
| Feature | Core i5-4670R | Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-4670R was priced at $224, while the Core i7-4702MQ came in at $383. On launch pricing ($224 vs $383), Core i5-4670R was $159 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670R delivers 23.4 pts/$ vs 13.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-4702MQ — making the Core i5-4670R the 53.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-4670R | Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224-42% | $383 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.4+73% | 13.5 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














