Core i5-4690T vs FX-6350

Core i5-4690T vs FX-6350 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4690T

4 / 4

4,620

0.0%

Core i5-7Y54

Pentium Gold G6405T

Pentium Dual Core T3200

4,640

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4690T vs FX-6350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4690T vs FX-6350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4690T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,620 vs 4,640).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.1 vs 35.2 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).

FX-6350

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($132 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
✅Delivers 46.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.2 vs 24.1 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6350 better than Core i5-4690T?

Yes. FX-6350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-6350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6350 is the better buy right now. FX-6350 comes in $60 cheaper on MSRP at $132 MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 46.1% better value on MSRP (35.2 vs 24.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4690T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4690T vs FX-6350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4690T

The Core i5-4690T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,620 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6350

The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4690T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-4690T versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-4690T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-6350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4690T scores 4,620 against the FX-6350's 4,640 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-6350.

Feature	Core i5-4690T	FX-6350
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.2 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	6144 kB+2300%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	4,620	4,640

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4690T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4690T	FX-6350
Socket	LGA1150	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4690T was priced at $192, while the FX-6350 came in at $132. On launch pricing ($192 vs $132), FX-6350 was $60 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4690T delivers 24.1 pts/$ vs 35.2 pts/$ for the FX-6350 — making the FX-6350 the 37.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4690T	FX-6350
MSRP	$192	$132-31%
Performance per Dollar	24.1	35.2+46%
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Core i5-4690T on Amazon

Search FX-6350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.