Core i5-5200U
VS
Core i3-4100M

Core i5-5200U vs Core i3-4100M

Intel

Core i5-5200U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i3-4100M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-5200U is positioned at rank 446 and the Core i3-4100M is on rank 114, so the Core i3-4100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-5200U

#434
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
586%
#435
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
578%
#436
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
530%
#437
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
528%
#438
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
523%
#440
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
505%
#441
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
484%
#442
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
483%
#443
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
470%
#446
Core i5-5200U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4100M

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
100%
#102
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
290%
#103
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
286%
#104
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
262%
#105
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
261%
#106
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
259%
#108
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
250%
#109
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
239%
#110
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
239%
#111
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
233%
#114
Core i3-4100M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $99
100%
#126
Celeron N4000
MSRP: $107|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-5200U leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-4100M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-5200UCore i3-4100M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-5200UCore i3-4100M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-5200U and Core i3-4100M

Intel

Core i5-5200U

The Core i5-5200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,503 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i3-4100M

The Core i3-4100M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,531 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-5200U and Core i3-4100M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-5200U versus 2.5 GHz on the Core i3-4100M — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-5200U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-5200U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4100M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5200U scores 2,503 against the Core i3-4100M's 2,531 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-4100M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-5200U vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4100M.

FeatureCore i5-5200UCore i3-4100M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+8%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,503
2,531+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5200U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4100M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-5200UCore i3-4100M
Socket
FCBGA1168
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-5200U) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4100M). The Core i3-4100M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-5200U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4100M targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-5200UCore i3-4100M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile