Core i5-520M
VS
A6-9500E

Core i5-520M vs A6-9500E

Intel

Core i5-520M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A6-9500E

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-520M is positioned at rank 1139 and the A6-9500E is on rank 609, so the A6-9500E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-520M

#1127
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3820%
#1128
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3764%
#1129
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3456%
#1130
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3440%
#1131
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3409%
#1133
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3292%
#1134
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3156%
#1135
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3151%
#1136
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3066%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
99%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
98%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
96%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
96%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9500E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10741%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10150%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7369%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2220%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1759%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1538%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
881%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
870%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
792%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
792%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
783%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
762%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
751%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
748%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
741%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
100%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
99%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
98%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
97%
#609
A6-9500E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
100%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
98%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
98%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
98%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
98%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9500E (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-520MA6-9500E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-520M (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-520MA6-9500E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($0)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-520M and A6-9500E

Intel

Core i5-520M

The Core i5-520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $225.

AMD

A6-9500E

The A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,741 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Core i5-520M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A6-9500E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-520M versus 3.4 GHz on the A6-9500E — a 14.8% clock advantage for the A6-9500E (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-520M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the A6-9500E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-520M scores 1,727 against the A6-9500E's 1,741 — a 0.8% lead for the A6-9500E. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-520M vs 0 kB on the A6-9500E.

FeatureCore i5-520MA6-9500E
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.93 GHz
3.4 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1024 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,727
1,741
Geekbench 6 Single
360
Geekbench 6 Multi
695
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-520M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-9500E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core i5-520M versus DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500E — the Core i5-520M supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500E supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-520M) vs 8 (A6-9500E) — the Core i5-520M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-520M) and AMD AM4 (A6-9500E).

FeatureCore i5-520MA6-9500E
Socket
PGA988
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1066+26550%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
8
32 GB+419430300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-520M) / not specified (A6-9500E). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-520M) and AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9500E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-520M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.

FeatureCore i5-520MA6-9500E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
AMD Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true