
Core i5-520M

Xeon L5335
Core i5-520M vs Xeon L5335 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-520M vs Xeon L5335 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-520M vs Xeon L5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-520M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $155 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.7 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Xeon L5335 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,727 vs 1,737).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5335, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
Xeon L5335
2007Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($380 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-520M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-520M better than Xeon L5335?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-520M vs Xeon L5335 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-520M
The Core i5-520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $225.

Xeon L5335
The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.
Processing Power
The Core i5-520M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon L5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-520M versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 37.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-520M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-520M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-520M scores 1,727 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon L5335. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-520M vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5335.
| Feature | Core i5-520M | Xeon L5335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.93 GHz+47% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB L2 Cache+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 4 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Clovertown (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,727 | 1,737 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 360 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 695 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-520M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-520M | Xeon L5335 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i5-520M) / not specified (Xeon L5335). The Core i5-520M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Xeon L5335 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-520M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.
| Feature | Core i5-520M | Xeon L5335 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-520M was priced at $225, while the Xeon L5335 came in at $380. On launch pricing ($225 vs $380), Core i5-520M was $155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-520M delivers 7.7 pts/$ vs 4.6 pts/$ for the Xeon L5335 — making the Core i5-520M the 50.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-520M | Xeon L5335 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-41% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.7+67% | 4.6 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














