
Core 2 Duo T7200

Core i5-520M
Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Core i5-520M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Core i5-520M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Core i5-520M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo T7200
2006Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,717 vs 1,727).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($286 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-520M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-520M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $286 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.7 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $286 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Core 2 Duo T7200 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-520M better than Core 2 Duo T7200?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Core i5-520M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T7200
The Core 2 Duo T7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $286.

Core i5-520M
The Core i5-520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T7200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-520M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7200 versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-520M — a 37.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-520M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7200 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-520M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7200 scores 1,717 against the Core i5-520M's 1,727 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-520M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7200 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-520M.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core i5-520M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.93 GHz+47% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,717 | 1,727 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 360 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 695 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7200 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-520M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7200 versus 1066 on the Core i5-520M — the Core i5-520M supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7200) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-520M).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core i5-520M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | 1066+60% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7200) vs true (Core i5-520M). The Core i5-520M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7200 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42; Core i5-520M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core i5-520M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo T7200 was priced at $286, while the Core i5-520M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($286 vs $225), Core i5-520M was $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T7200 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-520M — making the Core i5-520M the 24.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core i5-520M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $286 | $225-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 7.7+28% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














