
A10-7300

Core 2 Duo T7200
A10-7300 vs Core 2 Duo T7200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-7300 vs Core 2 Duo T7200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-7300 vs Core 2 Duo T7200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-7300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $136 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $286 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.6 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $286 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core 2 Duo T7200 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core 2 Duo T7200
2006Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,717 vs 1,736).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($286 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-7300 better than Core 2 Duo T7200?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-7300 vs Core 2 Duo T7200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7300
The A10-7300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,736 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo T7200
The Core 2 Duo T7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $286.
Processing Power
The A10-7300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-7300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-7300 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7200 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the A10-7300 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-7300 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7300 scores 1,736 against the Core 2 Duo T7200's 1,717 — a 1.1% lead for the A10-7300.
| Feature | A10-7300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+60% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB | 4 MB |
| Process | 28 nm-57% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,736+1% | 1,717 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-7300 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-7300 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7200 — the A10-7300 supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A10-7300) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7200).
| Feature | A10-7300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+140% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7300) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7200). The A10-7300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7300 targets Laptop, Core 2 Duo T7200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7300 rivals Core i3-4010U; Core 2 Duo T7200 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | A10-7300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Laptop | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10-7300 was priced at $150, while the Core 2 Duo T7200 came in at $286. On launch pricing ($150 vs $286), A10-7300 was $136 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-7300 delivers 11.6 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T7200 — making the A10-7300 the 63.4% better value option.
| Feature | A10-7300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-48% | $286 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.6+93% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2006 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















