
Core 2 Duo T7200

Xeon E5502
Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Xeon E5502 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Xeon E5502 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Xeon E5502: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo T7200
2006Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,717 vs 1,725).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5502, which brings 2 cores / 2 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($286 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
Xeon E5502
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 2 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅Costs $98 less on MSRP ($188 MSRP vs $286 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($188 MSRP vs $286 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 80W vs 4W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5502 better than Core 2 Duo T7200?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Xeon E5502 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T7200
The Core 2 Duo T7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $286.

Xeon E5502
The Xeon E5502 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,725 points. Launch price was $95.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T7200 and Xeon E5502 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7200 versus 1.87 GHz on the Xeon E5502 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7200 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7200 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon E5502 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7200 scores 1,717 against the Xeon E5502's 1,725 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5502. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7200 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5502.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Xeon E5502 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+7% | 1.87 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+8% | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Gainestown (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,717 | 1,725 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7200 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon E5502 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7200 versus DDR3-800 on the Xeon E5502 — the Xeon E5502 supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo T7200) vs 3 (Xeon E5502). Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7200) and Intel 5500,Intel 5520,Intel X58 (Xeon E5502).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Xeon E5502 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-800+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 144 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 32 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7200) vs true (Xeon E5502). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7200 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Xeon E5502 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo T7200 was priced at $286, while the Xeon E5502 came in at $188. On launch pricing ($286 vs $188), Xeon E5502 was $98 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T7200 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5502 — making the Xeon E5502 the 41.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Xeon E5502 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $286 | $188-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 9.2+53% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














