Core i5-5300U
VS
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Core i5-5300U vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Intel

Core i5-5300U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-5300U is positioned at rank 758 and the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is on rank 638, so the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-5300U

#746
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1083%
#747
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1067%
#748
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
980%
#749
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
975%
#750
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
966%
#752
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
933%
#753
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
895%
#754
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
893%
#755
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
869%
#758
Core i5-5300U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#762
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#767
Core i7-1250U
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
#773
Core i7-9750HF
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1400

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
99%
#626
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
861%
#627
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
849%
#628
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
779%
#629
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
776%
#630
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
769%
#632
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
742%
#633
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
712%
#634
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
711%
#635
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
691%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-5300U (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-5300UCeleron Dual-Core T1400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2M (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-5300UCeleron Dual-Core T1400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-5300U and Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Intel

Core i5-5300U

The Core i5-5300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,709 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,725 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-5300U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron Dual-Core T1400's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-5300U versus 1.73 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 — a 50.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-5300U. The Core i5-5300U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses Merom-2M (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5300U scores 2,709 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1400's 2,725 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1400.

FeatureCore i5-5300UCeleron Dual-Core T1400
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+68%
1.73 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Merom-2M (2008)
PassMark
2,709
2,725
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5300U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-5300UCeleron Dual-Core T1400
Socket
FCBGA1168
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-5300U) / No (Celeron Dual-Core T1400). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1400 rivals Pentium T2370.

FeatureCore i5-5300UCeleron Dual-Core T1400
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget