
Core i5-560M vs Celeron G3900T

Core i5-560M

Celeron G3900T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-560M is positioned at rank 1121 and the Celeron G3900T is on rank 451, so the Celeron G3900T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-560M
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-560M | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) | ✅ More affordable ($70) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-560M | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+222%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) | ✅ More affordable ($70) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-560M and Celeron G3900T

Core i5-560M
The Core i5-560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,894 points. Launch price was $225.

Celeron G3900T
The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-560M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3900T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-560M versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-560M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-560M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G3900T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-560M scores 1,894 against the Celeron G3900T's 1,900 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G3900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 514, a 13.3% lead for the Celeron G3900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 950 vs 903 (5.1% advantage for the Core i5-560M). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-560M vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900T.
| Feature | Core i5-560M | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+23% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+2% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total)+50% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,894 | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450 | 514+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 950+5% | 903 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-560M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3900T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i5-560M versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900T — the Celeron G3900T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,PM55,QM57 (Core i5-560M) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900T).
| Feature | Core i5-560M | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR4-2133+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-560M) vs VT-x (Celeron G3900T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Core i5-560M) and HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-560M targets Laptop, Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-560M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660; Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.
| Feature | Core i5-560M | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) | HD Graphics 510 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x |
| Target Use | Laptop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-560M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Celeron G3900T debuted at $42.
| Feature | Core i5-560M | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $42-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $70 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











