
Core i5-670

Core i7-7Y75
Core i5-670 vs Core i7-7Y75 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-670 vs Core i7-7Y75 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-670 vs Core i7-7Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-670
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($284 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($284 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Core i7-7Y75 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-7Y75.
Trade-offs
- ❌1522.2% higher power demand at 73W vs 4.5W.
Core i7-7Y75
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 5W instead of 73W, a 69W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,534 vs 2,553).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-670.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-670 better than Core i7-7Y75?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-670 vs Core i7-7Y75 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-670
The Core i5-670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $252.

Core i7-7Y75
The Core i7-7Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,534 points. Launch price was $393.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-670 and Core i7-7Y75 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.73 GHz on the Core i5-670 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-7Y75 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-670 (base: 3.46 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i5-670 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-670 scores 2,553 against the Core i7-7Y75's 2,534 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-670. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-670 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7Y75.
| Feature | Core i5-670 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.73 GHz+4% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.46 GHz+166% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,553 | 2,534 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 638 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-670 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-670 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-670) / not specified (Core i7-7Y75). The Core i5-670 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Core i7-7Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-670 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-670 rivals Phenom II X4 955.
| Feature | Core i5-670 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-670 was priced at $284, while the Core i7-7Y75 came in at $393. On launch pricing ($284 vs $393), Core i5-670 was $109 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-670 delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-7Y75 — making the Core i5-670 the 32.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-670 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $284-28% | $393 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+41% | 6.4 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














