
Celeron G5920
Popular choices:

Core i5-670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Celeron G5920
2020Why buy it
- ✅+18.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $232 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 451.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.6 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 58W instead of 73W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-670.
Core i5-670
2010Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G5920.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (638 vs 756).
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,553 vs 2,577).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 49.6 PassMark/$ ($284 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ❌25.9% higher power demand at 73W vs 58W.
Celeron G5920
2020Core i5-670
2010Why buy it
- ✅+18.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $232 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 451.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.6 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 58W instead of 73W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G5920.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-670.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (638 vs 756).
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,553 vs 2,577).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 49.6 PassMark/$ ($284 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ❌25.9% higher power demand at 73W vs 58W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G5920 better than Core i5-670?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Celeron G5920 | Core i5-670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Celeron G5920 | Core i5-670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Celeron G5920 | Core i5-670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Celeron G5920 | Core i5-670 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G5920 and Core i5-670

Celeron G5920
Celeron G5920
The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-670
Core i5-670
The Core i5-670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $252.
Processing Power
The Celeron G5920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-670's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 versus 3.73 GHz on the Core i5-670 — a 6.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-670 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.46 GHz). The Celeron G5920 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-670 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5920 scores 2,577 against the Core i5-670's 2,553 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G5920. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 756 vs 638, a 16.9% lead for the Celeron G5920 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-670.
| Feature | Celeron G5920 | Core i5-670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.73 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+1% | 3.46 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,577 | 2,553 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 756+18% | 638 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,248 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G5920 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-670 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5920 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-670 — the Celeron G5920 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5920 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5920) and H55,H57,P55,Q57 (Core i5-670).
| Feature | Celeron G5920 | Core i5-670 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5920) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-670). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5920) and HD Graphics (Core i5-670) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget, Core i5-670 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405; Core i5-670 rivals Phenom II X4 955.
| Feature | Celeron G5920 | Core i5-670 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G5920 launched at $52 MSRP, while the Core i5-670 debuted at $284. On MSRP ($52 vs $284), the Celeron G5920 is $232 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5920 delivers 49.6 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-670 — making the Celeron G5920 the 138.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G5920 | Core i5-670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-82% | $284 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.6+451% | 9.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












