Core i5-7260U
VS
Celeron N5105

Core i5-7260U vs Celeron N5105

Intel

Core i5-7260U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Celeron N5105

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i5-7260U is positioned at rank #297 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7260U

#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#285
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
445%
#286
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
439%
#287
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
403%
#288
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
401%
#289
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
397%
#291
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
384%
#292
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
368%
#293
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
367%
#294
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
357%
#297
Core i5-7260U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-7260U leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N5105 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-7260UCeleron N5105
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-7260UCeleron N5105
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-7260U and Celeron N5105

Intel

Core i5-7260U

The Core i5-7260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,953 points. Launch price was $304.

Intel

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-7260U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N5105 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-7260U versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-7260U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-7260U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N5105 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7260U scores 3,953 against the Celeron N5105's 4,003 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron N5105. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-7260U vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105.

FeatureCore i5-7260UCeleron N5105
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+17%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+10%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
1.5 MB (total)+200%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark
3,953
4,003+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,192
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7260U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N5105 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-7260UCeleron N5105
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1338
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7260U) / not specified (Celeron N5105). The Core i5-7260U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics 640), while the Celeron N5105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7260U rivals A12-9720P.

FeatureCore i5-7260UCeleron N5105
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop