Core i5-7260U vs Ryzen Embedded R2312

Intel

Core i5-7260U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R2312

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-7260U vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7260U vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7260U vs Ryzen Embedded R2312: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7260U

2017

Why buy it

  • +0% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics 640, while Ryzen Embedded R2312 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded R2312 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Embedded R2312

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,952 vs 3,953).
  • Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-7260U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7260U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2312 better than Core i5-7260U?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Embedded R2312 is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7260U pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7260U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Embedded R2312 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded R2312 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-7260U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (26.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded R2312 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-7260U vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-7260U

The Core i5-7260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,953 points. Launch price was $304.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R2312

The Ryzen Embedded R2312 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,952 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-7260U and Ryzen Embedded R2312 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-7260U versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2312 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2312 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-7260U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7260U scores 3,953 against the Ryzen Embedded R2312's 3,952 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-7260U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-7260U vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2312.

FeatureCore i5-7260URyzen Embedded R2312
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark
3,953
3,952
Geekbench 6 Single
1,192
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7260U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-7260URyzen Embedded R2312
Socket
BGA1356
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7260U) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R2312). The Core i5-7260U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics 640), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7260U rivals A12-9720P.

FeatureCore i5-7260URyzen Embedded R2312
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop