Celeron N5095
VS
Core i5-7260U

Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-7260U

Intel

Celeron N5095

4 Cores4 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i5-7260U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7260U

#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#285
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
445%
#286
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
439%
#287
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
403%
#288
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
401%
#289
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
397%
#291
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
384%
#292
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
368%
#293
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
367%
#294
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
357%
#297
Core i5-7260U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-7260U leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N5095 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N5095Core i5-7260U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N5095Core i5-7260U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N5095 and Core i5-7260U

Intel

Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,013 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-7260U

The Core i5-7260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,953 points. Launch price was $304.

Processing Power

The Celeron N5095 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-7260U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5095 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-7260U — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-7260U (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron N5095 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-7260U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5095 scores 4,013 against the Core i5-7260U's 3,953 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron N5095. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron N5095Core i5-7260U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+200%
512 kB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Jasper Lake (2021)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,013+2%
3,953
Geekbench 6 Single
1,192
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5095 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-7260U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N5095Core i5-7260U
Socket
BGA1338
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5095) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7260U). The Core i5-7260U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics 640), while the Celeron N5095 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7260U rivals A12-9720P.

FeatureCeleron N5095Core i5-7260U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop