
Core i5-7400

Core i7-4710HQ
Core i5-7400 vs Core i7-4710HQ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7400 vs Core i7-4710HQ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7400 vs Core i7-4710HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7400
2017Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i7-4710HQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4710HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,477 vs 5,549).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i7-4710HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌38.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 47W.
Core i7-4710HQ
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 65W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4710HQ better than Core i5-7400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7400 vs Core i7-4710HQ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7400
The Core i5-7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,477 points. Launch price was $182.

Core i7-4710HQ
The Core i7-4710HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,549 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7400 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4710HQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7400 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710HQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-7400 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4710HQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7400 scores 5,477 against the Core i7-4710HQ's 5,549 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-4710HQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4710HQ.
| Feature | Core i5-7400 | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+20% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Crystalwell (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 5,477 | 5,549+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,359 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,215 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,517 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7400 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4710HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7400 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4710HQ — the Core i5-7400 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7400 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-7400 | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1364 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+50% | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7400) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4710HQ). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7400) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4710HQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7400 targets Gaming, Core i7-4710HQ targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-7400 rivals Ryzen 3 3300X.
| Feature | Core i5-7400 | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














