
Core i5-7400

Ryzen 3 2300U
Core i5-7400 vs Ryzen 3 2300U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7400 vs Ryzen 3 2300U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7400 vs Ryzen 3 2300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7400
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 2300U needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 3 2300U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,477 vs 5,484).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 2300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 3 2300U
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-7400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 2300U better than Core i5-7400?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7400 vs Ryzen 3 2300U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7400
The Core i5-7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,477 points. Launch price was $182.


Ryzen 3 2300U
The Ryzen 3 2300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,484 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-7400 and Ryzen 3 2300U share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7400 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300U — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-7400 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-7400 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2300U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7400 scores 5,477 against the Ryzen 3 2300U's 5,484 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 2300U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2300U.
| Feature | Core i5-7400 | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+3% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 5,477 | 5,484 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,359 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,215 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,517 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7400 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 2300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7400 | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7400) / not specified (Ryzen 3 2300U). The Core i5-7400 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 2300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-7400 rivals Ryzen 3 3300X.
| Feature | Core i5-7400 | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














