Core i5-7400 vs N150

Intel

Core i5-7400

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

N150

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 3.6 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-7400 vs N150 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7400 vs N150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7400 vs N150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7400

2017

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while N150 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike N150.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while N150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while N150 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N150

2025

Why buy it

  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,418 vs 5,477).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7400 better than N150?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, N150 is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7400 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-7400 is the better buy right now. Core i5-7400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that N150 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
N150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-7400 vs N150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-7400

The Core i5-7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,477 points. Launch price was $182.

Intel

N150

The N150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,418 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-7400 and N150 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7400 versus 3.6 GHz on the N150 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the N150. The Core i5-7400 is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-7400 scores 5,477 against the N150's 5,418 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-7400. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400 vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N150.

FeatureCore i5-7400N150
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
5,477+1%
5,418
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,359
Geekbench 6 Single
1,215
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,517
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7400 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N150 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-7400N150
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7400) / not specified (N150). The Core i5-7400 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the N150 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-7400 rivals Ryzen 3 3300X.

FeatureCore i5-7400N150
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming