
Core i5-7600

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Core i5-7600 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7600 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7600 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7600
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 22.7 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,568 vs 6,661).
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-7600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.7 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G better than Core i5-7600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7600 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7600
The Core i5-7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,568 points. Launch price was $224.


Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,661 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-7600 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-7600 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-7600. The Core i5-7600 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7600 scores 6,568 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G's 6,661 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7600 vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G.
| Feature | Core i5-7600 | Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+17% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,568 | 6,661+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,307 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7600 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7600 | Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7600) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G). The Core i5-7600 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7600 rivals Ryzen 5 1500X.
| Feature | Core i5-7600 | Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-7600 was priced at $224, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G came in at $294. On launch pricing ($224 vs $294), Core i5-7600 was $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7600 delivers 29.3 pts/$ vs 22.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G — making the Core i5-7600 the 25.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-7600 | Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224-24% | $294 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3+29% | 22.7 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















