Core i5-7600 vs Xeon E7340

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7600 vs Xeon E7340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7600 vs Xeon E7340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7600

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Xeon E7340 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E7340.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌
5.2% HIGHER MSRP
$224 MSRPvs$213 MSRP

Xeon E7340

2007

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,544 vs 6,568).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7600.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7600 better than Xeon E7340?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7340 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-7600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-7600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-7600 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7340 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-7600 comes in 5.2% more expensive on MSRP at $224 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E7340 is also 4.8% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 29.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-7600 vs Xeon E7340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7600

The Core i5-7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,568 points. Launch price was $224.

Xeon E7340

The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7600 is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-7600 scores 6,568 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-7600. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7600 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.

Feature	Core i5-7600	Xeon E7340
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+46%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	6,568	6,544
Geekbench 6 Single	1,307	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7600 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-7600	Xeon E7340
Socket	LGA1151	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7600) / not specified (Xeon E7340). The Core i5-7600 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E7340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7600 rivals Ryzen 5 1500X.

Feature	Core i5-7600	Xeon E7340
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-7600 was priced at $224, while the Xeon E7340 came in at $213. On launch pricing ($224 vs $213), Xeon E7340 was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7600 delivers 29.3 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E7340 — making the Xeon E7340 the 4.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-7600	Xeon E7340
MSRP	$224	$213-5%
Performance per Dollar	29.3	30.7+5%
Release Date	2017	2007

Search Core i5-7600 on Amazon

Search Xeon E7340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.