Core i5-8210Y
VS
A10-5700

Core i5-8210Y vs A10-5700

Intel

Core i5-8210Y

2 Cores4 Thrd7 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018
VS
AMD

A10-5700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-8210Y is positioned at rank 1086 and the A10-5700 is on rank 448, so the A10-5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8210Y

#1074
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3028%
#1075
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2983%
#1076
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2739%
#1077
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2727%
#1078
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2702%
#1080
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2609%
#1081
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2502%
#1082
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2497%
#1083
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2430%
#1086
Core i5-8210Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
99%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
96%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6809%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6434%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4671%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1407%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1115%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
975%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
559%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
551%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
502%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
502%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
496%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
483%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
476%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
474%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
470%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
98%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
98%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
98%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
98%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
98%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
97%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#448
A10-5700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
100%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
99%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
99%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
99%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
98%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-8210Y (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-8210YA10-5700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-5700 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-8210YA10-5700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8210Y and A10-5700

Intel

Core i5-8210Y

The Core i5-8210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,723 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Processing Power

The Core i5-8210Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-5700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-8210Y versus 4 GHz on the A10-5700 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-8210Y uses the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the A10-5700 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8210Y scores 2,723 against the A10-5700's 2,747 — a 0.9% lead for the A10-5700. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-8210Y vs 0 kB on the A10-5700.

FeatureCore i5-8210YA10-5700
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.4 GHz+112%
L3 Cache
4 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,723
2,747
Geekbench 6 Single
796
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8210Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-5700 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-2133 on the Core i5-8210Y versus 1866 on the A10-5700 — the A10-5700 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5700 supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i5-8210Y) vs 16 (A10-5700) — the A10-5700 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8210Y) and A55,A75,A85X (A10-5700).

FeatureCore i5-8210YA10-5700
Socket
FCBGA1515
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-2133
1866+62100%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+26214300%
64
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
16+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8210Y) vs true (A10-5700). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 617 (Core i5-8210Y) and Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-8210Y rivals Athlon 3050U; A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.

FeatureCore i5-8210YA10-5700
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 617
Radeon HD 7660D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Tablet/2-in-1