Core i5-8210Y vs FX-4130

Core i5-8210Y vs FX-4130 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-8210Y

2 / 4

2,723

+0.2%

2,718

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-8210Y vs FX-4130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-8210Y vs FX-4130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-8210Y

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 7W instead of 125W, a 118W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 617, while FX-4130 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4130 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

FX-4130

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,718 vs 2,723).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core i5-8210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1685.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8210Y better than FX-4130?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-4130 is ahead with a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8210Y pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8210Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-8210Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-8210Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. FX-4130 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (27.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-8210Y vs FX-4130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8210Y

The Core i5-8210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,723 points. Launch price was $281.

FX-4130

The FX-4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 August 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,718 points. Launch price was $112.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-8210Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4130 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4130 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-8210Y versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-4130 — a 8% clock advantage for the FX-4130 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-8210Y uses the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4130 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8210Y scores 2,723 against the FX-4130's 2,718 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-8210Y.

Feature	Core i5-8210Y	FX-4130
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	3.8 GHz+137%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	4096 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	2,723	2,718
Geekbench 6 Single	796	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8210Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4130 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-8210Y	FX-4130
Socket	FCBGA1515	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8210Y) / not specified (FX-4130). The Core i5-8210Y includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 617), while the FX-4130 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-8210Y rivals Athlon 3050U.