Athlon X4 750 vs Core i5-8210Y

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i5-8210Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750

4 / 4

2,751

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-8210Y

2 / 4

2,723

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i5-8210Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i5-8210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $95 MSRP, while Core i5-8210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-8210Y

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 617, while Athlon X4 750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,723 vs 2,751).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750 better than Core i5-8210Y?

Yes. Athlon X4 750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 750 is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $95 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i5-8210Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-8210Y

The Core i5-8210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,723 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-8210Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-8210Y — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-8210Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Core i5-8210Y's 2,723 — a 1% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Core i5-8210Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+11%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+112%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,751+1%	2,723
Geekbench 6 Single	—	796

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8210Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 versus LPDDR3-2133 on the Core i5-8210Y — the Core i5-8210Y supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 750) vs 10 (Core i5-8210Y) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8210Y).

Feature	Athlon X4 750	Core i5-8210Y
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	LPDDR3-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+60%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 750) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8210Y). The Core i5-8210Y includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 617), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop, Core i5-8210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-8210Y rivals Athlon 3050U.