A10-5700 vs Core i5-8210Y

A10-5700 vs Core i5-8210Y Performance Spectrum

A10-5700

4 / 4

2,747

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-8210Y

2 / 4

2,723

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5700 vs Core i5-8210Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5700 vs Core i5-8210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5700

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-8210Y.

Trade-offs

❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.

Core i5-8210Y

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,723 vs 2,747).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5700.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5700 better than Core i5-8210Y?

Yes. A10-5700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5700 still makes the most sense overall. A10-5700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5700 vs Core i5-8210Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-8210Y

The Core i5-8210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,723 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-8210Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-5700 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-8210Y — a 10.5% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A10-5700 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-8210Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Core i5-8210Y's 2,723 — a 0.9% lead for the A10-5700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5700 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-8210Y.

Feature	A10-5700	Core i5-8210Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+11%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+112%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,747	2,723
Geekbench 6 Single	—	796

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-8210Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A10-5700 versus LPDDR3-2133 on the Core i5-8210Y — the Core i5-8210Y supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5700) vs 10 (Core i5-8210Y) — the A10-5700 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A10-5700) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8210Y).

Feature	A10-5700	Core i5-8210Y
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1866	LPDDR3-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+60%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-5700) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8210Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5700) and UHD Graphics 617 (Core i5-8210Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220; Core i5-8210Y rivals Athlon 3050U.