Core i5-8210Y
VS
Athlon X4 750

Core i5-8210Y vs Athlon X4 750

Intel

Core i5-8210Y

2 Cores4 Thrd7 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018
VS
AMD

Athlon X4 750

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-8210Y is positioned at rank 1086 and the Athlon X4 750 is on rank 611, so the Athlon X4 750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8210Y

#1074
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3028%
#1075
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2983%
#1076
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2739%
#1077
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2727%
#1078
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2702%
#1080
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2609%
#1081
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2502%
#1082
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2497%
#1083
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2430%
#1086
Core i5-8210Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
99%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
96%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 750

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10764%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10171%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7385%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2225%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1762%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1542%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
883%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
871%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
793%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
793%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
784%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
763%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
753%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
750%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
743%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
99%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
98%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
97%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
96%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
100%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
99%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
98%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
98%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
98%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
97%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-8210Y (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-8210YAthlon X4 750
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon X4 750 (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-8210YAthlon X4 750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8210Y and Athlon X4 750

Intel

Core i5-8210Y

The Core i5-8210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,723 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-8210Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X4 750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-8210Y versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-8210Y uses the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon X4 750 uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8210Y scores 2,723 against the Athlon X4 750's 2,751 — a 1% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

FeatureCore i5-8210YAthlon X4 750
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.4 GHz+112%
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
4 MB+700%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
2,723
2,751+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
796
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8210Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 750 uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-2133 memory speed. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i5-8210Y) vs 16 (Athlon X4 750) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8210Y) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750).

FeatureCore i5-8210YAthlon X4 750
Socket
FCBGA1515
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-2133
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
16+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8210Y) vs AMD-V (Athlon X4 750). The Core i5-8210Y includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 617), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1, Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-8210Y rivals Athlon 3050U.

FeatureCore i5-8210YAthlon X4 750
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 617
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Tablet/2-in-1
Desktop