Core i5-8400T
VS
Xeon E5-2650

Core i5-8400T vs Xeon E5-2650

Intel

Core i5-8400T

6 Cores6 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2650

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8400T

#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
109%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
108%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
108%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
108%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
108%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
107%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
107%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
107%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
106%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
106%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
105%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
104%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
104%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
104%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
103%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
100%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
94%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
94%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
93%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
90%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
88%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
86%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
83%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
83%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
80%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
79%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
73%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
68%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
68%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5655%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1068%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
949%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
733%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
97%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
97%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
95%
#406
Xeon E5-2650
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-8400T (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-8400TXeon E5-2650
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($179)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2650 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-8400TXeon E5-2650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($179)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8400T and Xeon E5-2650

Intel

Core i5-8400T

The Core i5-8400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,426 points. Launch price was $182.

Intel

Xeon E5-2650

The Xeon E5-2650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,349 points. Launch price was $91.

Processing Power

The Core i5-8400T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-8400T versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-8400T (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-8400T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8400T scores 7,426 against the Xeon E5-2650's 7,349 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-8400T. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-8400T vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650.

FeatureCore i5-8400TXeon E5-2650
Cores / Threads
6 / 6
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+18%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
2 GHz+18%
L3 Cache
9 MB (total)
20480 kB (total)+122%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
7,426+1%
7,349
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,737
Geekbench 6 Single
1,092
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,816
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-8400T versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2650 — the Core i5-8400T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-8400T) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2650). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-8400T) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2650) — the Xeon E5-2650 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-8400TXeon E5-2650
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
384 GB+200%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
40+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-8400T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650). The Core i5-8400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2650 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 targets Server.

FeatureCore i5-8400TXeon E5-2650
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server