Core i5-9400H vs Xeon X7350
Core i5-9400H
Xeon X7350
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-9400H is positioned at rank 421 and the Xeon X7350 is on rank 248, so the Xeon X7350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-9400H
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X7350
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-9400H | Xeon X7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($182) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Tigerton (2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-9400H | Xeon X7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($182) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-9400H and Xeon X7350
Core i5-9400H
The Core i5-9400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,794 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon X7350
The Xeon X7350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Tigerton (2007) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,836 points. Launch price was $2,301.
Processing Power
The Core i5-9400H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon X7350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-9400H versus 0.93 GHz on the Xeon X7350 — a 128.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-9400H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core i5-9400H uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X7350 uses Tigerton (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9400H scores 7,794 against the Xeon X7350's 7,836 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X7350. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i5-9400H vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X7350.
| Feature | Core i5-9400H | Xeon X7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+362% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.93 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) | Tigerton (2007) |
| PassMark | 7,794 | 7,836 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,341 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-9400H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7350 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-9400H versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon X7350 — the Core i5-9400H supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-9400H) vs 4 (Xeon X7350). Chipset compatibility: HM370,QM370 (Core i5-9400H) and Intel 7300 (Xeon X7350).
| Feature | Core i5-9400H | Xeon X7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+100% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-9400H) vs VT-x (Xeon X7350). The Core i5-9400H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X7350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9400H targets High Performance Laptop, Xeon X7350 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-9400H rivals Ryzen 5 4600H; Xeon X7350 rivals Core i3-2100.
| Feature | Core i5-9400H | Xeon X7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | High Performance Laptop | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-9400H and Xeon X7350
