PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-9600T vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-9600T vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-9600T

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,601 vs 19,532).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 18 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +71.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 9 MB).
✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
✅Delivers 149.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 45.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core i5-9600T?

Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 71.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 103.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 71.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 103.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 9 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in $39 cheaper on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 71.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 149.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 45.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 100% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 9 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/6. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-9600T vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-9600T

The Core i5-9600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,601 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-9600T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Core i5-12400F's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-9600T versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-9600T scores 9,601 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 68.2% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,344 vs 1,700, a 23.4% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-9600T vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

Feature	Core i5-9600T	Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	9 MB Intel® Smart Cache	18 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	—	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	9,601	19,532+103%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	12,380
Geekbench 6 Single	1,344	1,700+26%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	657

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-9600T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-9600T versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-9600T) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B360,H370,H310,Q370,Z390,B365 (Core i5-9600T) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

Feature	Core i5-9600T	Core i5-12400F
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-9600T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9600T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-9600T rivals Ryzen 5 2400G; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Core i5-9600T	Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	Gaming Performance/Value

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-9600T was priced at $213, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($213 vs $174), Core i5-12400F was $39 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9600T delivers 45.1 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 85.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-9600T	Core i5-12400F
MSRP	$213	$174-18%
Performance per Dollar	45.1	112.3+149%
Release Date	2019	2022

Search Core i5-9600T on Amazon

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.